Apps should ask for evidence
Platform guides should ask what changed, what stayed stable, what evidence supports the explanation, and what alternative explanations remain possible.
Habits of inquiry and conduct that support trustworthy science learning and guided study.
Scientific Virtues
evo-edu.org should not present scientific thinking only as a set of facts or procedures. It should also cultivate the habits that make inquiry trustworthy: curiosity, honesty, skepticism, attentiveness, humility to evidence, and readiness to abandon a preferred answer when the evidence does not support it.
How this should shape evo-edu.org
Platform guides should ask what changed, what stayed stable, what evidence supports the explanation, and what alternative explanations remain possible.
Concept pages should show how scientific ideas are tested, refined, and sometimes rejected rather than presenting them as frictionless conclusions.
Species pages and bibliography work should emphasize provenance, uncertainty, and the difference between raw source material and reviewed interpretation.
Guidance for Didactopus
This framing follows Rob Pennock's virtue-based approach to scientific practice and the VERITIES work at Michigan State: responsible science is not only rule compliance, but the cultivation of dispositions that support trustworthy inquiry and ethical research culture.